728x90_2 (1)
Published On: Mon, May 25th, 2009

911 Building 7 BBC report of fall, before it happened. Voodoo?- examining the evidence

[ad#medium]
On September 11 2001, a British broadcaster- Jane Standley announced twice as can be seen clearly in the video below, 20 minutes early that ‘building 7′ had collapsed. This is not disputed according to the BBC defense of the issue which is posted  below.


Now, upon attack by Prisonplanet about how on earth the reporter could report an event clearly before it’s occurrence. Prisonplanet asking whether their accurate preempting of the fall of WTC 7 was by clairvoyance.

BBC’s response to this attack by prison planet can be seen here. And this response if we can call it so, is more like an acknowledgment of their role in this conspiracy and not a defense of the issue. Their full defense is posted below including their quoting/referencing the Prisonplanet attack:

BBC response:

1. We’re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I’m quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate – but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did – sourced our reports, used qualifying words like “apparently” or “it’s reported” or “we’re hearing” and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone

BBC image of Prisonplanet article on Jan Stadley {BBC}

BBC image of Prisonplanet article on Jane Standley {BBC}

who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I’ve spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn’t remember minute-by-minute what she said or did – like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I’d love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don’t help clear up the issue one way or another.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… ” [1]

Please notice the serious problems with the BBC rebuttal-

1. Confusion to the best of our knowledge does not cause accurate preemption.

2. She looked very composed as she gave that announcement and did so with great detail.

3. No tapes…cock-up? Really?

Watch Video with annotations:

Voodoo?
The evidence is quite clear, the story speaks for itself, and the BBC response even makes it more clear. 911 and the sad events of that day and the conspiracy behind it is common knowledge among the masses of the world today. Yup, you got it right. BBC used voodoo, pure African voodoo to preempt the self-collapse of building 7, straight from the coasts of Cotonou in west Africa.

Newscaster confusion-premonition voodoo from West Africa

Related:

BBC- Four of alleged hijackers found alive and well post 911 [2]

Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.

His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.

Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.

He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.

He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.

But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.

Mistaken identity

Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.

Abdelaziz Al Omari

Abdelaziz Al Omari ‘lost his passport in Denver’

He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.

Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.

The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.

Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.

Khalid Al-Midhar

Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive

He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.

And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.

FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt

. [2]

Comments

comments

Get our toolbar!
Powered by alexa, with the button at right corner. Get to know the traffic rank of websites you visit for your browsing security, confidence and trust.

Hot