May 6th, 2011
How long did they know?
This is a very important question. All of a sudden, we find out that the US knew Obama’s whereabouts since August 2010 as they claimed. But is this actually the truth? If they knew he was hiding in an easy to ambush house in Pakistan for 10 months, could they not have known same without admitting for 13 months, or say 60 months(5 years)? Does it really take 10 months to plan a raid of a simple unguarded house in Pakistan? These same elite sophisticated army who are known for stealth operations such as the ‘raid on Entebbe’ as far back as 1976! 10 months is way too long but the truth is likely several times longer.
Mixed up stories. Amnesia?
We all watch movies and discuss them without crazy distortions or errors in narration. How come the Obama theater
could not simply relate the movie they watched with honesty, clarity and simplicity? We have heard the most irritating array of ridiculous stories on the murder of Osama Bin Laden all from the White House. That it was a full fire-for-fire fight. That Osama fired RPGs, that Osama pulled out a Kalashinkov in one hand and held his wife as shield in the other and finally we hear that Osama was unarmed, and that only one person outside the house was armed.
Why was it so impossible for the White house to simply tell us the movie they watched? Why have their stories changed as much as the stories of Jessica Lynch, of Pat Tillman, of WMD’s in Iraq, of Uranium from Africa and an eternal list of similar tales?
With the lies, can we even bother to listen to or believe anything else they profess? Is there a repercussion for lies, as we in our individual careers are liable of. We as teachers are liable if we lie. We as physicians, as engineers, as cleaners are liable to address, redress and discipline for lies. What does the White House get for these blatant lies?
Planned Assassination
The latest story of the assassination has it that the seasoned NAVY seals were actually sent with instructions to plain and simply assassinate Bin laden. This is evident from the fact that upon entering the building with no one armed in the building, they shot and killed Osama’s son on the stairs, even though the poor boy was unarmed and harmless.
Next they assassinated several other people in the building, who had at best toy guns as we see in the picture on the right, and finally even though they had the opportunity to bring in Osama to justice and shame, they shot him for ‘moving toward some guns near the door’. This is a joke of course. Who waits after he has heard shots all over the compound for seals to burst into his room before advancing toward the gun. Oh, perhaps a dead sleeper like Osama who slept through the initial barrage of shots, door break-downs and bombings. We know he uses Ambien for his insomnia, and then there’s that deafness in the left ear problem.
Yup, as the white house said, “they were engaged in a fire fight through out the operation”. The only thing they didn’t say was, who was firing the fight they were engaged in.
What is really funny is, if this story came out of Africa, for instance if Mugabe, president of Zimbabwe had claimed he killed an enemy of state in such fashion, the observing world will totally understand the fire fight his troops were “engaged” in.
Buried at sea.
[ad#medium]
Firstly, the word ‘bury’ refers to the process of ‘putting in the ground’. Who drowns dead bodies when land is available? Barbarians? This tale is probably the most hilarious since the ‘Jeffersons’. The tale goes, he was hurriedly dumped to the sharks to prevent his ghost from haunting the world. In Muslim rights, or is it wrongs? Well Muslims certainly do not drown dead bodies in the sea when land is over abundant. No one does so. And since when did USA extremely respect Muslim rights? Oh perhaps they respect these ‘rights’ of dead Muslims. So here’s a word to Muslims- get dead and the US will respect your rights to and beyond the letter. This joke, that they dumped Osama to swim with the big fish needs no further discourse. It is simple tosh. Many analysts have said Osama has been dead for over 8 years now. George Bush was actually about to announce this just as Osama did, till the tale was hinted in the media and he deserted it. It’s either that or, Osama who used to be under the CIA employ has been relocated and given a new identity, perhaps he now walks and clubs in the Big Apple.
NewsRescue- “911 Building 7 brought down by explosives” – US News
The citizens of the United States paid over 2.5 trillion dollars to big corp USA to find this man. And to think that the evidence of value for their money invested was hurriedly dumped to the sharks, reeks of fraud. And of course we must not forget citizens of the entire world who contributed and suffered equally due to the saga that was Osama. They too had a right to decide what to do with the evidence and when to do so. But alas, the ocean bottom holds one more secret.
No Photos!
Just that, no photos! OK, can we watch the movie too? Like serious this is the twentieth century, who cares about the pictures. We all want to watch the movie. That is what we deserve to see, not some dumb photos. Who is asking for photos? This is a case of misplaced priorities and prerogatives. We all watched the video of Sadam’s head being plucked off, and it did not stir any riots or rackets. So what’s up with this, seriously? Yes, we don’t wish to see the photos, lets keep our priorities straight, we want to watch the movie! We must all watch the movie we paid over $2.5 trillion for.
House arrest
We take another look at the circumstances of Bin Ladens termination. Osama was supposedly living for 5 years at least in this house with 20 feet walls. In the aerial picture of the house, the house is more than obvious and suspicious.
Pakistan is the US’ 4th largest beneficiary of military aid, over 1.5 billion dollars every year. Indeed Pakistan the only Muslim Nation that has Nukes is one of the greatest ally’s of the US. ISI is in essence an arm of the CIA The US will never continue to pump so much money to Pakistan and support their military arsenal if their security services were not in transparent cooperation. Whoever lived in that compound was under house arrest. This is clear and simple.
Firstly, it is claimed that the house was a million dollar home. Look closely. It was only a million dollar prison. Look at all the pictures of the interior. That house was only good for tall walls and electric barbed wires. Located safely in Pakistan’s military zone. The interior of the house was the cheapest living environment possible. Never an environment that you find in a home that cost a million dollars. The so-called Osama room had the cheapest bed ever. Not the kind of bed a person planning to hide away for a while in a million dollar home would ever stay in. No furniture, absolutely nothing was in that house! It was simply a prison. Osama’s family were locked up in the house till necessary.
Secondly, will a running terrorist live in a mansion? Like seriously, who does that? A mastermind like Osama choosing to live in a fortified, stand-out mansion, with no body guards, no security, but only a high flying mast. And then we see Osama had no access to internet for the past five years. As Micheal Moore, the famous US movie maker said on CNN’s Piers Morgan show, May 5th 2011, Osama living without internet in that house leaves many questions unanswered, that we will soon know the answers to, that point only to the conclusion that he was under house arrest, orchestrated by the ISI and pentagon, known for it’s many lies.
Selecting a time to strike, striking time
[ad#medium]
Why did Osama choose the day of the Royal wedding in England to strike? He had all of 10 months to strike? Was the dark skinned, mixed race US president trying to spoil our fun. Well we know he wasn’t invited to the party, but he should have let us keep enjoying the monarchical party going on in England. Why did he have to spoil our fun? We weren’t invited too and we did not set up that period to evict our tenants or set exams for our students or stage elective surgeries for our patients or repair our clients homes, or setup that long requested appointment to scrub the house. Why did Osama choose the day of the royals wedding to make this hit? And then are there other things this event is diverting our attention from? Some of us know these things, when events are set up to divert the masses focus from deeper events taking place in the global platform. What else did we miss, apart from the glamorous wedding?
We must ask ourselves. Who, what corporation, entity, or individuals benefited ,most from Osama’s ten years of ‘rain’? This question may be the most important.
Related:
911 Building 7 BBC report of fall, before it happened. Voodoo?- examining the evidence
May, 8th 2011
US Senator, John Kerry: The White house’s many lies were due to their Beast Nature!
Source: CNN- Stop blaming SEAL’s, Kerry says
Washington (CNN) – Democratic Sen. John Kerry said it is time to stop questioning the exact occurrences in Osama bin Laden’s house before his death in Abbottabad, Pakistan, at the hand of U.S. Navy SEALs.
“I thinks those SEALs did exactly what they should have done,” the senator from Massachusetts and 2004 presidential nominee said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “And we need to shut up and move on about, you know, the realities of what happened in that building.”
Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the information gleaned from bin Laden’s compound underscores his active role in the terrorist network.
“He was, in fact, the center,” Kerry said.
He also praised the Obama administration’s handling of the situation, despite errors in initial information disseminated by the White House, something he said is “the nature of the beast.”
“Letting these folks know that we have this information is actually a way of deterring certain activities from taking place,” Kerry said. “So I think they’re (al Qaeda) on the defensive, significantly so. And I think strategically the administration has done very, very well.”
A famed Nigerian singer, late Fela Anikulapo Kuti, once sang that the colonialist could not give Africans freedom and human rights. These being his innate rights and property. He sang that Prime minister Botha of South Africa had declared that the uprising of the times will bring out the beast in the European colonialist. The statements of a beast within made by US Senator John Kerry, bear startling semblance, and make us question what ‘Beast’, is so well resonated with.
