Related: Corruption and it’s many results
Submitted by Affey (not verified) on Jun, 17 2014, 1:06AM in Article: Crisis In Iraq: A Result of Reckless Global Interventions By Peregrino Brimah
The government of Maliki had all the opportunity to govern for all the Iraqis. He refused to do so. Nigeria has a lot of lessons to learn from this. There is no need for Jonathan to keep on acting like a south south man. He can be a president for all Nigerians. But they won’t do so. Corruption will not allow them to do it. In the first place, it is corruption that is enhancing their capacity to do so.
June 17, 2014
“Iraq, in a sense, has broken apart from us,” he told The Daily Beast. “Geographically we practically have to cross another country to get to Baghdad. We have to cross through territory that is governed and secured by forces that are not loyal to the federal government in Baghdad.”
Events in the last week prove this point. The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a one-time al Qaeda offshoot, conquered the northern city of Mosul, Saddam Hussein’s home town of Tikrit and has marched ever closer to Baghdad in recent days.
Amidst the rampage, Iraqi officers and soldiers abandoned critical outposts in and around the Kurdish majority city of Kirkuk. The Kurdistan Regional Government sent their own forces, known as the Peshmerga, to fill those positions left behind by Iraq’s army.
For years, politicians and analysts have warned that Iraq—a country formed in 1920 by the world’s great powers from three distinct ethnic and confessional regions—would eventually break apart.
In 2006 Joe Biden, when he was a senator, wrote with Daily Beast contributor Les Gelb an op-ed that argued Iraq’s government should devolve into a “federal system,” with each region enjoying a kind of hyper autonomy similar to the dissolution of Yugoslavia after the Balkan wars.
President Bush and later President Obama went in another direction and tried to strengthen Iraq’s central government. But with ISIS marching on Baghdad and Iraq’s most important Shi’ite religious leader calling on Iraq’s Shi’ites to take up arms against them, Iraq is breaking apart nonetheless.
The most important development in this respect is what happened last week in Kirkuk. Talabani told The Daily Beast that the Peshmerga deployment to Kirkuk was actually approved by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
“No one has asked us to abandon those posts in Kirkuk,” Talabani said. “On the contrary, the Iraqi prime minister’s office gave us the green light to do what we can to protect as much territory as we can in the north.”
“Geographically we practically have to cross another country to get to Baghdad. We have to cross through territory that is governed and secured by forces that are not loyal to the federal government in Baghdad.”
The fact that Peshmerga secured positions in Kirkuk with the blessing of Maliki’s Shi’ite-dominated government is in itself a sign of how desperate things have become. For years Kirkuk was one of the thorniest issues for Iraq’s leaders. During the rule of Saddam Hussein, Kurds were forced out of their homes in Kirkuk. After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Kurdish families returned to their homes that were now occupied by Arab Iraqis and have elbowed their way back into old neighborhoods at times with the help of Kurdish-dominated security forces. Efforts to reconcile these differences have been delayed and the issue remains disputed.
Maliki has also clashed recently with the Kurds as well. Since January, Maliki’s government has refused to send the block grants to the regional government that pay for the salaries of the region’s civil servants. The Kurds have responded by accelerating their effort to sell oil pumped out of the Kurdish regions directly to the world market through a pipeline with Turkey, bypassing the Baghdad government altogether.
“Baghdad forced our hands,” Talabani said. “They gave us no other choice but to seek out revenue independently from Baghdad.”
Talabani said the presence of Peshmerga troops at Kirkuk—which has significant oil resources itself—does not change its status. “It doesn’t change anything on the ground, ultimately we have said Kirkuk belongs to the Kirkukis,” he said. “It’s something we always felt rests with the people of Kirkuk. The fact that there are no longer Iraqi units outside the city, it does not change Kirkuk’s status in the country.”