Lazy eyes listen
With the Supreme Court poised to strike down abortion as a constitutional right, the vice president warns of government overreach
Vice President Kamala Harris has warned that if the US Supreme Court overturns constitutional protection of abortion rights, as expected, it will amount to the state infringing on personal liberties.
“At its core, this is about our future as a nation, about whether we live in a country where the government can interfere in personal decisions,” Harris said on Thursday in a meeting by videoconference with abortion providers and abortion advocates. “This is about our future.”
At issue is a Supreme Court decision that would strike down Roe v Wade, a landmark 1973 ruling that protected abortion as a constitutional right. A draft of the court’s 5-3 decision against Roe v Wade, and leaving the abortion issue for states to decide, was leaked to the media earlier this month. The ruling is expected to be issued officially in late June or early July.
This is a critical moment for reproductive rights. Today I am meeting with abortion providers and leading advocates who are on the frontlines of the war on women's rights. Tune in. https://t.co/htVSC6PT5P— Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) May 19, 2022
The vice president’s virtual meeting with abortion providers came on the same day that lawmakers in Oklahoma passed a bill banning abortion from the moment of “fertilization.” Governor Kevin Stitt has vowed to sign and enact any anti-abortion legislation that reaches his desk, as he did when he approved a bill last month making it a felony for abortionists to terminate a pregnancy.
“Think about that for a second, from the moment of fertilization,” Harris said. “It’s outrageous, and it’s just the latest in a series of extreme laws around the country.” She added that such laws are designed to “punish and control women.”
Harris argued that the Supreme Court decision represents a threat to all Americans, not just women, because the original Roe v Wade ruling was based on a finding that prohibiting abortion would infringe privacy rights.
“The right to privacy that forms the basis of Roe is the same right to privacy that protects the right to use contraception and the right to marry the person you love, including a person of the same sex,” she said. “Overturning Roe opens the door to restricting those rights.”
It would be a direct assault on the fundamental right to self-determination, to live and love without interference from the government.
However, another landmark ruling in an abortion case – Planned Parenthood v Casey in 1992 – found that terminating a pregnancy is a unique act, unlike other privacy rights, because it involves consequences for others, including the life that is terminated. The 5-4 ruling in the Casey case upheld abortion as constitutionally protected, but it opened the door for states to impose restrictions, as long as they didn’t impose an “undue burden” on people seeking abortions.