|
Lazy eyes listen
|
MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than the Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh, is still one of the best, most comprehensive descriptions of the many possible unintended consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.” December 9, 2021, their paper was reprinted in the Townsend Letter, the Examiner of Alternative Medicine. Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT who has been conducting research at MIT for over five decades, has spent a large portion of her career investigating the hazards and mechanisms of action of glyphosate. Her attention was diverted to the science of mRNA gene transfer technologies in early 2020, when Operation Warp Speed was announced.
ABSTRACT
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency
Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through
controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the
technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological
response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a
wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative
diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of
prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies
supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an
unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of
debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While
there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario,
supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby
injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We
conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of
these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
Download the full paper:
