Billonaire Judge Quits Saraki’s Case Over Reports Of His Corruption

Justice Abdukadir Abdu-Kafarati of a Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday withdrew from the case filed by the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, seeking an order to stop his trial for false assets declaration before the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

‎The development, according to Punch Newspaper, followed reports on Sahara Reporters and online media accusing the judge of having been compromised by Saraki.

This consequently stalled the judgment that was to be delivered in the case on Tuesday.

Justice Abdu-Kafarati said his integrity had been maligned by the reports and the honourable thing for him to do was to disqualify himself from the case

The judge, who quoted copiously the online reports, said he had been caught between two devils.

“If I grant the prayers of the applicant. The reading public will say yes, the judge has been compromised. If I refuse the prayers, they will say the judge has been threatened or intimidated.

“The most honourable thing for me to do is to disqualify myself from this case. I hereby disqualify myself from this case and the file is returned to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for re-assignment.”

Justice Abdul-Kafarati had on March 1, heard and fixed Tuesday for judgment in Saraki’s case.

The judgment was to come on the heel of an earlier verdict of the Supreme Court which had on February 5 validated the Senate President’s trial before the CCT.
Incidentally, the CCT itself on March 18 fixed Thursday to deliver its ruling on Saraki’s another application challenging the validity of the charges and the tribunal’s jurisdiction to entertain the case.

An earlier application by Saraki seeking an order halting his trial ‎was dismissed by the CCT, and the tribunal’s ruling became a subject of appeals which he lost at the Court of Appeal and finally laid to rest by the Supreme Court’s judgment which also dismissed it on February 5.

Both his suit before the Federal High Court and his ‎fresh application before the CCT are anchored primarily on the same grounds.

He argued, essentially in the two legal actions, that the charges had been rendered invalid, robbing the tribunal of its jurisdictions due to failure of the Code of Conduct Bureau to invite him and confront him with the alleged infractions in his assets declaration forms before filing the charges.

He contended that the failure of the CCB to confront him with the said infractions constituted a breach of his fundamental human rights to fair hearing and by extension rendered the charges a nullity.